From my observations, Camelbak Hydration systems are poor choices for transporting water while traveling. My reasoning is simple: they leak. It is my impression that convenience is not nearly worth the cost of loosing your water supply — or of having it leak all over the inside of your backpack. However there may be some some better options for hydration backpacks available.
It is easy to criticize just about anything. I am an American. I come from a country in which the propensity for thinking critically is a mistaken indicator of intelligence. It is very easy for me to look upon a piece of travel or hiking gear and find its weaknesses.
I use this stuff, I know how to find its weak points before they break.
Sometimes I write about these weak points as a way of coming up with better ideas that some clever travel gear designer could take and use (high hopes) or just for the sake of common complaining.
Critical intelligence is a double sided endeavor, as criticism is the impetus to come up with a better way of doing something, but criticism for its own sake is a hallow pedestal to place your intellect upon.
In point, just because I point out a piece of travel gear’s weak points does not mean that I 100% do not recommend it, it just means that the design is not perfect and I am trying to spin some wheels towards what could be better. But sometimes not perfect is the best you can get. I still use those bacteria petri dish Klean Kanteen water bottles — they do the job even though they are not perfect.
But one piece of outdoor gear that I absolutely DO NOT recommend for traveling are Camelbak water carriers. These things malfuction to the point of being a complete saftey hazard.
In a seven week period I have witnessed four different Camelbak systems malfunction and spill their water upon the ground — wasting it.
Camelbak hydration systems are essentially water bladders that are built into backpacks with a tube that extends up over the shoulder and can be accessed with the mouth easily without much manipulation from the hands.
Half of the archaeology crew that I am working with in Arizona use Camelbaks to carry their water. Very often we work miles away from the field vehicles, sometimes in 100+ degree heat. To loose your water in this circumstance is to put yourself in a bad position. Four times I have observed the Camelbaks of my crew mates malfunction and leak large amounts of water.
In this same amount of time I have not observed any other water carrying device used by the crew malfunction once.
The first malfunction that I observed took place when a shrub in the desert clipped the tube that leads from the Camelbak, dislodging it. An entire bladder full of water poured out upon the desert.
For the second malfunction, a crew member accidentally slipped the mouthpiece off of the hydration tube, and, as the tube went the way of gravity, the water leaked out upon the ground.
For the third malfunction that I observed, a crew member set her Camelbak down upon the connection valve that leads to the tube and it was dislodged, leaking water.
The forth malfunction was a simple, though major, leak that occurred out of the screw on top of the Camelbak. Most of water leaked from the device and soaked a good deal of archaeology gear.
The Camelbak, I am sure, has its place. If you are rock climbing, running, motorcycle riding or biking recreationally — in a place where a water spill would be only an annoyance rather than a hazard — then the backpack and tube Camelbak units would probably be a great benefit. If you are doing an outdoor activity that requires the constant use of both hands, then I say that Camelbaks may be worth the risk. But for traveling, it is my impression that there is no need for this technology.
When traveling, or hiking into the backcountry, your water carrying device has to be as malfunction proof as possible. Also, the last thing a traveler wants to have happen is a bladder full of water leaking all over the inside of their rucksack.
Travel gear should be as near to idiot proof as possible. If it is easy to misuse a piece of travel gear, then it may not be very well designed. Likewise, if it takes a great amount of attention and energy to prevent your gear from malfunctioning then it may be better to find different gear.
It is my impression that simple, standard, screw on top bottles are a far better way to transport water to remote locations or while traveling than the convenience implied by Camelbak hydration systems.
It is also my impression that it takes a very lazy person to not want to put in the effort to simply remove a bottle from a backpack each time they want to drink. I almost smile when I think of the price that many people are apparently paying for the lure of convenience.
Note: November 19, 2009 — Camelbak tubes freeze in cold weather
After I first published this entry the weather turned cold in the Tonto Forest. On a 20 degree morning one crew member went to take a suck from his Camelbak and found that the water had froze in the tube. The device was thus rendered useless.
Camelbak hydration systems are not adequate for cold weather travel.